Awareness, Adoption, and Perceived Barriers to Reusable Menstrual Products Among Women: A Pilot Cross-Sectional Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/e7mpez15Keywords:
Menstrual hygiene, Reusable menstrual products, Menstrual cup, Sustainability, Women's health, IndiaAbstract
Background: Reusable menstrual products (RMPs), such as menstrual cups, reusable cloth pads, and period underwear, offer a safe, affordable, and environmentally sustainable alternative to disposable menstrual products. Despite their potential health, economic, and environmental benefits, their use remains limited in many parts of India due to inadequate awareness, misconceptions, and sociocultural barriers. This study aimed to assess women's knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding reusable menstrual products and identify perceived barriers to their adoption.
Methods: A community-based cross-sectional pilot study was conducted among 104 women aged 17–45 years in an urban area of Western Uttar Pradesh, India, between December 2025 and March 2026. Participants were recruited through snowball sampling. Data were collected using a pretested, self-administered structured questionnaire covering sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, practices, perceived benefits, barriers, and sustainability-related perceptions of reusable menstrual products. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results: Almost all participants (97.1%) had heard of reusable menstrual products, and 90.4% knew about their correct use and cleaning. Menstrual cups were the best-known product (88.5%), followed by period underwear (77.9%). More than half (56.7%) believed reusable menstrual products were safe, although one-third remained unsure. Participants widely recognised their environmental friendliness (85.6%), long-term affordability (80.8%), ease of use (79.8%), and ability to reduce disposal-related waste (76.9%). However, concerns about discomfort during use (63.5%), hygiene (61.5%), maintenance and cleaning (58.7%), comfort (57.7%), and insertion (57.7%) continued to discourage adoption. Most women also believed that reusable menstrual products could reduce environmental waste (85.6%), decrease plastic pollution (76.9%), and support more sustainable lifestyles (80.8%). The internet and social media were the most common sources of information (61.5%).
Conclusion: Although awareness of reusable menstrual products was high, their wider acceptance was hindered by practical concerns and persistent misconceptions. Providing evidence-based menstrual health education, practical demonstrations, and improving access to quality reusable products may help overcome these barriers. Integrating reusable menstrual products into menstrual health promotion programmes could improve menstrual hygiene management while contributing to environmental sustainability.
References
1.Johnson, E., Seed, L., Biju, A., & Tulinius, C. (2025). Experiences, perceptions and barriers to use of reusable menstrual products among university students globally: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 15, e103159. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103159
2.van Eijk, A. M., Jayasinghe, N., Zulaika, G., Mason, L., Sivakami, M., Unger, H. W., et al. (2021). Exploring menstrual products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reusable menstrual pads for public health internationally. PLoS ONE, 16, e0257610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257610
3.van Eijk, A. M., Zulaika, G., Lenchner, M., Mason, L., Sivakami, M., Nyothach, E., et al. (2019). Menstrual cup use, leakage, acceptability, safety and availability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 4, e376–e393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30111-2
4.Hennegan, J., Winkler, I. T., Bobel, C., Keiser, D., Hampton, J., Larsson, G., et al. (2021). Menstrual health: A definition for policy, practice, and research. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(1), 1911618. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2021.1911618
5.Aujla, M., Logie, C. H., Hardon, A., & Narasimhan, M. (2025). Environmental impact of menstrual hygiene products. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 103, 223–225. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.24.291421
6.Marroquin, J., Kiomourtzoglou, M. A., Scranton, A., & Pollack, A. Z. (2024). Chemicals in menstrual products: A systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 131, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17668
7.Behera, S. M., Epari, V., Behera, P., & Patro, B. K. (2024). Promotion and strategies of menstrual cup use among healthcare providers: A primer towards a sustainable solution for menstrual health and hygiene management in India. Indian Journal of Community Health, 36(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.47203/IJCH.2024.v36i01.003
8.Twisha, K., & Chidurala, R. (2025). Acceptability and feasibility of using menstrual cups as an alternative menstrual hygiene product: A tertiary care-based prospective study. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20251727
9.Swathika Devi, R., Sekhar, M. A., Narayanan, K., et al. (2025). Bridging the knowledge gap: Awareness, attitudes and practices regarding menstrual cup usage among medical students in Chennai, India. Cureus.
10.Kattimani, V., Alekhya, D. L., Pathralapati, S., Sojin, S. S., Patel, S., Prabhakar, C., et al. (2024). Knowledge, attitude, perception and practices towards disposal of sanitary napkins among young females: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 16. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_908_23
11.Vidal-Ayuso, F., Akhmedova, A., & Jaca, C. (2023). The circular economy and consumer behaviour: Literature review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418, 137824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137824
12.Bildhauer, B., & Owen, L. (2023). Menstrual stigma rearticulated as environmental pollution in contemporary Scottish policy-making. Women's Reproductive Health, 10(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2022.2097034
13.Johnston-Robledo, I., & Chrisler, J. C. (2020). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as social stigma. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 245–258). Palgrave Macmillan.
14.World Health Organization. (2022). Women's health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/womens-health
15.World Health Organization. (2022). WHO statement on menstrual health and human rights. https://www.who.int/news/item/22-06-2022-who-statement-on-menstrual-health-and-rights
16.United Nations Children's Fund. (2019). Guidance on menstrual health and hygiene. UNICEF.
17.UNICEF Supply Division. (2024). Menstrual hygiene products. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/supply/menstrual-hygiene-products
18.World Bank. (2022). Menstrual health and hygiene. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/brief/menstrual-health-and-hygiene
19.United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
20.World Health Organization. (2023). Seventy-sixth World Health Assembly: Resolution on menstrual health and hygiene. World Health Organization.
