A Bibliometric Study on Financial Inclusion: Past, Present and Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/zpwy6232Keywords:
financial inclusion, bibliometric analysis, gender barriers, digital finance, FinTech, PMJDYAbstract
Financial inclusion research has expanded fast but the literature itself tells an awkward story. This study reviews 1,996 open access peer reviewed articles from the Dimensions database (2015–2025) using bibliometric analysis via the bibliometrix R package. Publication output grew at 31.56% CAGR over the period. Financial literacy, digital finance, credit access, and rural geography are the structural pillars of this field; FinTech and digital adoption are the fast moving edges. The country rankings cut against what you might expect: the UK, US, and Indonesia are the top three contributors by output. India ranks fourth, despite being the subject of most of this research. That asymmetry between who produces knowledge and who it is about runs through the whole field. Co-citation analysis reveals two distinct intellectual communities: one focused on household and gender outcomes, another on institutional finance and governance. The paper concludes with recommendations for policymakers, financial institutions, and civil society organisations working on gender equitable finance in India and similar contexts.
References
1.Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
2.Asongu, S. A., & Nwachukwu, J. C. (2017). The comparative inclusive human development of globalisation in Africa. Social Indicators Research, 134(3), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1467-4
3.Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2007). The economic lives of the poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.1.141
4.Bhatt, M., & Bhatt, S. (2016). Rural financial inclusion in India: Progress, barriers and the road ahead. Indian Journal of Economics and Development, 12(3), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.5958/2322-0430.2016.00054.9
5.Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
6.Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of "bibliometrics". Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
7.Chakravarty, S. R., & Pal, R. (2013). Financial inclusion in India: An axiomatic approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35(5), 813–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.12.007
8.Datta, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2021). Socio-cultural determinants of women's financial exclusion in rural India. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(6), 815–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1789595
9.Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1897-4
10.Digital Science. (2023). Dimensions: The most comprehensive research database. https://www.dimensions.ai
11.Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
12.Ghosh, S., & Vinod, D. (2017). What constrains financial inclusion for women? Evidence from Indian micro data. World Development, 92, 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.011
13.Government of India. (2023). Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana: Progress report. Ministry of Finance, Department of Financial Services. https://pmjdy.gov.in
14.Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378
15.Hook, D. W., Porter, S. J., & Herzog, C. (2018). Dimensions: Building context for search and evaluation. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 3, 23. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00023
16.Islam, M. R., Hossain, S. Z., Velayutham, S., & Rahman, R. A. (2018). Banking on shared value: A study on IBBL in Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(10), 1–6.
17.Klapper, L., El-Zoghbi, M., & Hess, J. (2016). Achieving the sustainable development goals: The role of financial inclusion. CGAP Working Paper. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
18.Kumar, N. (2013). Financial inclusion and its determinants: Evidence from India. Indian Economic Review, 48(2), 279–292.
19.Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
20.Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2021). Microfinance: Financial and social performance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-102620-103510
21.Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
22.Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1569–1614. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1569
23.Nandan, N. (2020). Digital financial inclusion in India: A pathway to sustainable development. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(14), 45–52.
24.Ongo Nkoa, B. E., & Song, J. S. (2020). Does institutional quality affect financial inclusion in Africa? A panel data analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33(1), 1901–1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1755558
25.Ozili, P. K. (2021). Financial inclusion research around the world: A review. Forum for Social Economics, 50(4), 457–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2020.1715296
26.Ozili, P. K. (2022). Financial inclusion and sustainable development: An empirical association. Journal of Money and Business, 2(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMB-08-2021-0034
27.Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
28.Pande, R., Cole, S., Sivasankaran, A., Goldberg, G., & Bastian, G. (2020). Making women's voices count: Integrating gender issues in development research. Journal of Development Economics, 146, 102512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102512
29.Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
30.Reserve Bank of India. (2021). Report of the internal working group on digital payment systems. Reserve Bank of India. https://www.rbi.org.in
31.Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockstrom, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
32.Swamy, V. (2014). Financial inclusion, gender dimension, and economic impact on poor households. World Development, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.019
33.Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
34.Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
35.United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations General Assembly. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
36.Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
37.Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112
38.World Bank. (2022). Financial inclusion overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialinclusion/overview
39.Yunus, M. (1999). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. PublicAffairs.
40.Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
