Emotional Biases in Digital Personal Finance Platforms: Evidence from App-Based Investors

Authors

  • A. Charles Ambrose Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli – 620024, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Dr. K. Alex Research Supervisor, Department of Commerce, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli – 620024, Tamil Nadu, India Author
  • Dr Sanjeev Salunke Associate Professor & Principal, Amitha College of Education, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Author
  • Ms.Shariba Tasleem Assistant Professor & Head of the Department, Department of Commerce, Falcon Degree College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Author
  • Ms.Sushmitha B R Research Scholar, Department Of Commerce and Management, University Of Technology, Jaipur, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66635/qgd1m217

Keywords:

Behavioral finance, Prospect theory, Mental accounting, Digital platforms, Generational differences, App-based investors

Abstract

Emotional biases significantly influence financial decision-making in digital contexts, yet empirical evidence on generational differences in app-based investment platforms remains limited. This study examines how prospect theory and mental accounting theory explain heterogeneous emotional biases across generations using urban Indian investors. Drawing on primary data from 472 app-based investors in Bengaluru (aged 18–65), we employ SPSS-based multivariate regression and multi-group structural analysis to test seven hypotheses spanning loss aversion, regret aversion, and mental accounting behavior. Results reveal statistically significant generational moderating effects (Gen Z vs. Millennials vs. Gen X): Gen Z exhibits a 2.3 times higher intensity of loss aversion bias (β = 0.562, p < 0.001) than Gen X investors. Mental accounting propensity demonstrates stronger mediation of emotional bias on trading frequency among Millennials (indirect effect = 0.341, p < 0.01) versus other generations. Binary logistic regression identifies app features (real-time notifications, visual portfolio dashboards) as significant moderators, reducing impulsive trading by 34% among emotionally biased investors (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.84). These findings extend behavioral finance theory to digital contexts and offer actionable insights for fintech platform design to mitigate the costs of emotional decision-making. Implications include gender-differentiated platform interventions and generational customization of user experience.

References

Zerodha Investor Behavior Report. (2024). Retail trading patterns in India: Annual behavioral analysis. Retrieved from https://zerodha.com/investor-research

[2] Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). (2024). Financial Inclusion Report: Digital investing trends. Government of India, Ministry of Finance.

[3] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

[4] Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Journal of Decision Making, 4(3), 199–214.

[5] Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting and consumer choice. In R. H. Thaler (Ed.), Mental accounting and worldly finances: Essays on the psychology of financial decisions (pp. 101–124). Russell Sage Foundation.

[6] Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2015). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352247

[7] Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage Books.

[8] Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2013). Losses as modulators of attention: Review and analysis of the unique way losses affect focus. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029383

[9] Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1985). The disposition effect. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330474

[10] Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2013). Losses as modulators of attention: Review and analysis of the unique way losses affect focus. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 497–518.

[11] Bengaluru Fintech Collaborative. (2024). Gen Z investment behaviors in mobile-first platforms: Qualitative and quantitative evidence—unpublished research brief.

[12] Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting and worldly finances. Russell Sage Foundation Essays, 45–71.

[13] Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92(368), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669

[14] Zeelenberg, M., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. K. (2002). Consequences of regret aversion: Effects on decision making under risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance, 88(1), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhp.2001.2873

[15] Das, S., Markowitz, H., Scheid, J., & Sudderth, M. (2010). Portfolios for investors who want to reach their goals while staying on the mean-variance efficient frontier. Journal of Wealth Management, 13(4), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2010.13.4.68

[16] Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2015). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.

[17] Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk-taking? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 373–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq004

[18] Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. Vintage Books.

[19] The Motley Fool Investing Survey. (2023). How Americans invest: A comprehensive survey of investing tools and sources. Retrieved from https://www.fool.com/research/gen-z-millennial-investors

[20] Bengaluru Fintech Collaborative. (2024). Gen Z investment behaviors in mobile-first platforms: Qualitative and quantitative evidence.

[21] Miranda, P., Chen, L., & Waldkirch, M. (2024). Behavioral nudging in fintech: Experimental evidence from retail investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37(2), e2341. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2341

[22] Shlomo, B., Roth, Z., Keinan, G., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). Notification and loss aversion in dynamic consumer decisions: Evidence from portfolio trading. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28(2), 147–161.

[23] Kellogg, B., Wolff, J., & Wolff, G. (2008). The role of simplification in interface design for complex systems. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJI1401_2

[24] Statista. (2024). Gender distribution in Indian fintech applications 2024. Market Research Database.

[25] Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

[26] Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[27] Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.223

[28] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

[29] Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., & Sodini, P. (2009). Measuring the financial sophistication of households. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 328–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.06.011

[30] Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. In C. Plott & V. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results (Vol. 1, pp. 1061–1073). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-7139(07)01113-8.

[31] Leković, M. (2019). Behavioral portfolio theory and behavioral asset pricing model as an alternative to standard finance concepts. Ekonomski Horizonti. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1903263L.

[32] How to Motivate Millenials at Work. https://www.ioatwork.com/motivating-geny-generational-differences-in-work-values/.

[33] ARDOLINO, P., Noventa, S., CUBICO, S., BELLOTTO, M., & FAVRETTO, G. (2017). Retirement and work values. An analysis of work values characterizing postretirement activities. https://core.ac.uk/download/217568377.pdf

[34] Massad, E., & Stupple, E. (2018). The Monty Hall problem revisited: Autonomic arousal in an inverted version of the game. PLoS One, 13(3), e0192542.

[35] Park, S. C. (2018). Investor's Overreaction to an Extreme Event: Evidence from the World Trade Center Terrorist Attack. Seoul Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.35152/snusjb.2018.24.2.001

[36] Leković, M. (2019). Behavioral portfolio theory and behavioral asset pricing model as an alternative to standard finance concepts. Ekonomski Horizonti. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1903263L.

[38] Aggarwal, M., & Gupta, V. (2020). Financial Literacy and Decision Making. ASBM Journal of Management, 13(1), 21-38.

[39] He, L., & Sun, L. (2025). Effects of Customized Generative AI on Student Engagement and Emotions in Visual Communication Design Education: Implications for Sustainable Integration. Sustainability, 17(22), 9963.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Emotional Biases in Digital Personal Finance Platforms: Evidence from App-Based Investors. (2026). Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 22(4S), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.66635/qgd1m217