Modelling the Models: An Integrative Review and Conceptual Framework for Leadership in Sustainable Enterprise in Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/c6zpbv42Keywords:
leadership models, sustainable leadership, green leadership, sustainable entrepreneurship, Asia, configurational leadershipAbstract
Leadership scholarship has proliferated into partially overlapping models, while sustainability research has added labels such as sustainable, responsible, green, environmentally specific and regenerative leadership. For enterprises in Asia, the central problem is not choosing among labels but identifying which influence mechanisms are viable for a particular sustainability and entrepreneurial challenge, and whether newer models add theoretical value beyond established processes. This integrative review develops a mechanism- and configuration-based framework that compares leadership models at the level of behaviors, causal processes, goals, stakeholder boundaries, system boundaries and contextual conditions. It proposes eight recurring mechanism families and embeds them in the Modelling-the-Models Leadership Configuration Cube (M²-LCC), defined by concern for people, concern for performance and responsiveness to the external environment. Regenerative leadership is positioned as a future-facing frontier of sustainability-oriented leadership because it shifts the evaluative horizon from continuity and harm reduction toward restoration, net-positive value and intergenerational socio-ecological renewal; the paper does not assume that it is universally superior or automatically mechanism-distinct. Equifinality explains why several configurations may be viable, while bounded rationality, stakeholder interpretation and configuration mobility explain selection and adjustment over time. The Leadership Model Distinctiveness Test (LMDT) distinguishes mechanism novelty from contextual, goal, stakeholder/system-boundary and temporal extensions. Asian institutional heterogeneity is treated as a boundary condition rather than a single cultural moderator. The framework generates testable propositions and an empirical agenda for SMEs, family enterprises, start-ups and sustainability-to-regeneration transitions.
References
1.Ahmad, S. (2025). The role of family governance, identity and social capital in the transgenerational sustainability of family SMEs. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 19(2), 388–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2023-0456
2.Algharabli, M. H., Jerónimo, H. M., & Henriques, P. L. (2026). Understanding sustainable leadership through an integrative systematic review of definitions boundaries and metrics. Discover Sustainability, 7, 598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02876-9
3.Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience and performance. Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571111128766
4.Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
5.Bakhshi, P., Agrawal, R., Mendon, S., Birau, R., & Bărbăcioru, I. C. (2023). Framework of SDG leadership among SMEs in South Asian nations—using interpretive structural modelling. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2253607. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2253607
6.Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.005
7.Begum, S., Ashfaq, M., Xia, E., & Awan, U. (2022). Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2911
8.Borland, H., Ambrosini, V., & Butler, M. (2026). Theoretical foundations for a sustainability and climate change strategic leadership typology: Towards regenerative leadership. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-026-06382-w
9.Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
10.Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00213.x
11.Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
12.Cronin, M. A., & George, E. (2023). The why and how of the integrative review. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120935507
13.Das, M., Rangarajan, K., & Dutta, G. (2020). Corporate sustainability in SMEs: An Asian perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2017-0176
14.Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258
15.Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., & Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005
16.Elsbach, K. D., & van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Creating high-impact literature reviews: An argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1277–1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12581
17.Eva, N., Howard, J. L., Liden, R. C., Morin, A. J. S., & Schwarz, G. (2025). An inconvenient truth: A comprehensive examination of the added value (or lack thereof) of leadership measures. Journal of Management Studies, 62(7), 3072–3117. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13156
18.Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
19.Fan, D., Breslin, D., Callahan, J. L., & Iszatt-White, M. (2022). Advancing literature review methodology through rigour, generativity, scope and transparency. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12291
20.Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. McGraw-Hill.
21.Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2024). A fatal flaw: Positive leadership style research creates causal illusions. The Leadership Quarterly, 35(3), 101771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101771
22.Fischer, T., Dietz, J., & Antonakis, J. (2026). Leadership styles revisited: From conceptual conflation to causal explanation and practical relevance. Journal of Business Research, 208, 116061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116061
23.Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586092
24.Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in management and organization science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 237–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.875671
25.Ghag, N., & Sonar, H. (2024). Sustainable entrepreneurship practices of Indian SMEs: A strategic approach using fuzzy Delphi and best worst method. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(3), 1794–1809. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3572
26.Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
27.Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
28.Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707154064
29.Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316665461
30.House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
31.Huang, L., Guo, Z., Deng, B., & Wang, B. (2023). Unlocking the relationship between environmentally specific transformational leadership and employees’ green behaviour: A cultural self-representation perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134857
32.Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Halim, H. A. (2020). How does sustainable leadership influence sustainable performance? Empirical evidence from selected ASEAN countries. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969394
33.Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
34.Le, T. T., & Gia, L. L. C. (2025). How green innovation and green corporate social responsibility transform green transformational leadership into sustainable performance? Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(2), 2527–2541. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3077
35.Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9047-z
36.Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.2307/256809
37.Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Effect of green transformational leadership on green creativity: A study of tourist hotels. Tourism Management, 57, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.05.007
38.Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
39.Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0441
40.Paul, L., Väätänen, J., Bhimani, H., & Mention, A.-L. (2025). Leading regenerative transformation: Cognitive frame characteristics shaping leaders' approaches to organizational development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(8), 10997–11023. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70153
41.Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Iqbal, Q. (2023). Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 134600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134600
42.Ribeiro, G. K. A., & Leitão, J. (2024). Sustainable leadership and sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review. Discover Sustainability, 5, 188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00383-3
43.Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820
44.Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
45.Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682
46.Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
47.Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking 'what is to be sustained' with 'what is to be developed'. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
48.Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
49.Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385695
50.Soni, M. (2023). Environmentally specific transformational leadership and pro-environmental behavior: An empirical analysis of energy sector. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(7), 3179–3194. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-01-2022-3117
51.Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
52.Zellweger, T. M., Nason, R. S., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511423531.
