Balancing Digital Privacy with Child Safety Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Rights-Based Framework for the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/pxhw4y78Keywords:
CRC, digital privacy, child safety, safety by design, age-appropriate design, children's data protectionAbstract
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1989, represents the most widely ratified human rights treaty in history with 196 parties as of 2026, yet today's children face unprecedented digital challenges that were entirely unimaginable at the time of its drafting. The intersection of digital privacy and child safety represents one of the most complex and frequently misunderstood tensions in contemporary children's rights discourse, with public discourse often framing these as competing interests where protecting children necessitates sacrificing privacy or where protecting privacy inevitably exposes children to harm. This research paper examines how the CRC framework, particularly through the Committee on the Rights of the Child's General Comment No. 25 (2021) on children's rights in relation to the digital environment, provides a comprehensive rights-based approach to balancing these seemingly opposing obligations by establishing that privacy and safety are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary dimensions of children's holistic protection. Drawing on international legal frameworks including the OECD Guidelines for Digital Service Providers (2024), the 5Rights Foundation's implementation guidance (2026), and scholarly analysis from the International Journal of Children's Rights (2024), this research demonstrates that achieving balance requires simultaneous implementation of privacy by design and safety by design principles, age-appropriate design frameworks, Child Rights Impact Assessments, and robust educational interventions. The paper analyzes the legal tensions between Article 16 (privacy) and Articles 19, 34, and 36 (protection from violence and exploitation), examines state implementation challenges across different jurisdictions including India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, and proposes a tiered consent model based on evolving capacities recognized in Article 5 of the CRC. This research provides a comprehensive theoretical and practical framework for policymakers, regulators, and technology companies operating in the digital children's rights space, with particular attention to the implementation gap between international commitments and domestic legal enactments.
References
1.5 Rights Foundation. (2021). 5Rights welcomes adoption of General Comment 25 by UNCRC. https://dig.watch/updates/5rights-welcomes-adoption-general-comment-25-uncrc
2.5Rights Foundation. (2024). Compliance. https://5rightsfoundation.com/our-work/compliance/
3.5Rights Foundation. (2026). UNCRC General comment No. 25 Fifth Anniversary Joint Letter. https://5rightsfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/UNCRC-General-comment-No.-25-Fifth-Anniversary-Joint-Letter.pdf
4.Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). (2023). Safeguarding Children: Using a Child Rights Impact Assessment. https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/document/publication/cria_2023_-final-_18aug2023_1_1_0.pdf
5.Cambridge University Press. (2022). Interpretation of IP Treaties in Accordance with Articles 31–33 VCLT. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/intellectual-property-ordering-beyond-borders/interpretation-of-ip-treaties-in-accordance-w
6.Data Guidance. (2024). International: OECD publishes a report on digital safety by design for children. https://www.dataguidance.com/news/international-oecd-publishes-report-digital-safety
7.DPO India. (2025). Protecting Children's Data in the Digital Age. https://www.dpo-india.com/Blogs/protecting-child-data/
8.Dissertation. (2024). Pacta Sunt Servanda and the Implementation Of International Human Rights Treaties. https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/theses/105/
9.European Court of Human Rights. (1978). Tyrer v. the United Kingdom (Application No. 5856/72), 2 EHRR 1.
10.Facebook. (2025). By recognising children as active participants in the digital ecosystem. https://www.facebook.com/scroll.in/posts/by-recognising-children-as-active-participants-in-the-digital-ecosystem-and-addr/108104
11.IJFMR. (2026). Protecting Children Online: Legal Rights, Risks, and Safety. https://www.ijfmr.com/research-paper.php?id=69166
12.Kilkelly, U. (2017). Children's Rights. Routledge.
13.Mayer Brown. (2025). Children's Online Privacy: Recent Actions by the States and the FTC. https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2025/02/protecting-the-next-generation-how-states-and-the-ftc-are-holding-bu
14.Mayer Brown. (2026). Little Users, Big Rules: Tracking Children's Privacy Legislation. https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2026/01/little-users-big-rules-tracking-childrens-privacy-legislation
15.OECD. (2021). OECD guidelines for digital service providers. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/272/5803627d-b49b-4894-8dbe-35f67fd10007.pdf
16.OECD. (2024). Towards digital safety by design for children. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/towards-digital-safety-by-design-for-children_c167b650-en.html
17.OHCHR. (2021). General comment No. 25 (2021) on children's rights in relation to the digital environment. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2021-childrens-rights-relation
18.OHCHR. (2021). Guidance establishes children's rights carry into digital world. https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2021/03/guidance-establishes-childrens-rights-carry-digital-world
19.Organization of American States (OAS). (1969). Vienna Convention Law Treaties. https://www.oas.org/legal/english/docs/vienna%20convention%20treaties.htm
20.Papers.SSRN. (2024). Out of the many interpretative. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5274216
21.PMC. (2023). Online Safety for Children and Youth under the 4Cs Risk Framework. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10453252/
22.SCIRP. (2024). Children in the Digital Space: Issues Researched and Suggestions for Future Research. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=133449
23.Studeersnel. (2019). Pacta sunt servanda + treaty interpretation. https://www.studeersnel.nl/nl/document/erasmus-universiteit-rotterdam/public-international-law/pacta-sunt-servanda-treaty-interp
24.Tobin, J., & Field, A. (2021). Article 16: The Right to Protection of Privacy. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/Privacy/SR_Privacy/privacy-child/Other-Stakeholders/15-Tobin-J-and-Fi
25.Universiteit Leiden. (2024). Age assurance needs to respect children's rights. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2024/10/age-assurance-needs-to-be-child-rights-respecting
26.UN News. (2022). Climate activist Leah Namugerwa's speech at COP-27. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/11/1130247
27.UN Secretary-General. (2024). Annual Report on Children and Armed Conflict (2024). https://childrenandarmedconflict.un.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Summary-of-the-Annual-Report-on-Children-and-Armed-Conflict.pdf
28.UNICEF. (2021). The climate crisis is a child rights crisis: Introducing the children's climate risk index. https://data.unicef.org/resources/childrens-climate-risk-index-report/
29.van der Hof, S., et al. (2024). Child rights impact assessment: impact and legal analysis. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item:4209972/download
30.Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). (1969). 1155 U.N.T.S. 331.
31.World Vision. (2024). CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT. https://www.wvi.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/Digital%20Environment%20policy%20brief-1.pdf
32.Zhang, L. (2023). Theory and Practice of Children's Personal Information Protection in China. International Data Privacy Law.
https://www.iail.tsinghua.edu.cn/xwdt/4bb7798b539243f6a140b3bb0262ef72.htm (Original Citation )- Zhang, L. (2023). 中国儿童个人信息保护理论与实践.
https://www.iail.tsinghua.edu.cn/xwdt/4bb7798b539243f6a140b3bb0262ef72.





