Beyond Formal Channels: A Stakeholder-Driven Closed-Loop Supply Chain Framework for Diagnosing Effectiveness Gaps in India's E-Waste Management System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/80885936Keywords:
e-waste management, closed-loop supply chain, stakeholder theory, triple bottom line, extended producer responsibility, IndiaAbstract
The government data in FY2024-25 indicates that the officially reported amount of e-waste collected, dismantled and recycled or disposed has increased to 70.71 per cent from 61.94 per cent in FY2023-24, according to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) (Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, 2025). India is considered as third largest E-waste producer in the world after China and United States. Even taking CPCB's own optimistic figures at face value, close to 30 percent of officially estimated generation remains outside documented formal channels in the most recent reporting year, and because CPCB's generation estimates are themselves modelled from producer sales data and average product life rather than measured directly, independent field-based research on India's informal e-waste sector suggests this gap understates the true scale of informal absorption.This gap between regulatory design and documented operational outcomes motivates the present paper. Drawing on Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984) and the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) framework (Elkington, 1997), this paper develops a conceptual model in which Government Policy Support, Consumer Awareness, Technology Readiness, and Infrastructure Availability act as stakeholder-driven antecedents of the Effectiveness of E-Waste Management, which in turn mediates the achievement of a Sustainable E-Waste Solution. Departing from prior applications of this model class, the paper reframes the mediating construct as a diagnostic "leakage point" at which stakeholder inputs are only partly converted into documented formal-channel outcomes, and it operationalises the TBL economic pillar through the concept of urban-mining value capture. The analysis draws on verified primary and official secondary data, including CPCB and Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change reporting to Parliament, National Green Tribunal filings, the Global E-waste Monitor 2024 (UNITAR/ITU), and peer-reviewed literature, to illustrate the framework's plausibility and to generate testable propositions for future primary research. The paper concludes with policy implications for EPR enforcement, informal-sector integration, and infrastructure planning in the Indian context.
References
1.Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., Yamamoto, T., McDonald, R., D'Angelo, E., Althaf, S., Bel, G., Deubzer, O., Fernandez-Cubillo, E., Forti, V., Gray, V., Herat, S., Honda, S., Iattoni, G., Khetriwal, D. S., Luda di Cortemiglia, V., Lobuntsova, Y., Nnorom, I., Pralat, N., & Wagner, M. (2024). The global e-waste monitor 2024. International Telecommunication Union and United Nations Institute for Training and Research. https://ewastemonitor.info/the-global-e-waste-monitor-2024/
2.Borthakur, A. (2015). Generation and management of electronic waste in India: An assessment from stakeholders' perspective. Journal of Developing Societies, 31(4), 220-248.
3.Borthakur, A., & Sinha, K. (2013). Electronic waste management in India: A stakeholder's perspective. Electronic Green Journal, 1(36).
4.Central Pollution Control Board. (2024). E-waste management system: Extended producer responsibility portal. https://eprewaste.cpcb.gov.in/#/
5.Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
6.Dutta, D., & Goel, S. (2021). Understanding the gap between formal and informal e-waste recycling facilities in India. Waste Management, 125, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.032
7.Dwivedy, M., & Mittal, R. K. (2012). Estimation of future outflows of e-waste in India. Waste Management, 32(8), 1723-1729.
8.Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
9.Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
10.Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 189-207). Blackwell.
11.Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
12.Koiwanit, J., & Filimonau, V. (2023). Stakeholder engagement in waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, Article 135732.
13.Kosarkar, M., & Barthwal, S. (2025). Environmentally conscious but helpless: Consumer challenges for participation in formal e-waste collection initiatives of India. Cleaner Waste Systems, 12, Article 100363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100363
14.Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (2022). E-waste (management) rules, 2022. The Gazette of India: Extraordinary. https://cpcb.nic.in/uploads/Projects/E-Waste/e-waste_rules_2022.pdf
15.Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. (2025, July 24). Parliament question: E-waste processing management [Press release]. Press Information Bureau. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2147876
16.Press Information Bureau. (2022). E-waste management [Press release]. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1941054
17.Report by CPCB in EA No. 04 of 2024 IN OA No. 512 of 2018 (Shailesh Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.). (2024). National Green Tribunal. https://www.greentribunal.gov.in/sites/default/files/news_updates/Report%20of%20CPCB%20in%20EA%20No.%2004%20of%202024%20IN%20OA%20No.%20512%20of%202018.pdf
18.Sengupta, D., Ilankoon, I. M. S. K., Kang, K. D., & Chong, M. N. (2023). Circular economy and household e-waste management in India. Part II: A case study on informal e-waste collectors (Kabadiwalas) in India. Minerals Engineering, 200, Article 108154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108154
19.Singhal, D., Lyngdoh, T., & Prabhakaran, P. (2021). Knowledge, attitude and practice study of health risks among e-waste recyclers in Delhi. Journal of Health and Pollution, 11(29), Article 210306. https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-11.29.210306





