Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021: A Critical Analysis Of Legal Framework And Challenges In India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/mada4m34Keywords:
Surrogacy, Surrogacy Regulation Act 2021, Altruistic Surrogacy, Commercial Surrogacy, Reproductive Rights, Surrogate Mother, Intended Parents, Assisted Reproductive Technology, Gender Justice, Reproductive AutonomyAbstract
Surrogacy is an important development of assisted reproductive technology (ART) that emerges as an alternative to parenthood for those individuals and couples who are not able to conceive naturally or carry a pregnancy.The combination of advancement in reproductive technologies with easier access to fertility clinics has led to the popularity of commercial surrogacy in Indian society. Initially, the absence of comprehensive laws gave rise to new fears on the exploitation and commodification of women's reproductive capacities, medical risks, risks of parentage disputes and the rights of children born through surrogacy. Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021 is a new legislation which tries to tackle such concerns by regulating surrogacy practices and protecting the interests of the parties involved. It reflects the complete departure from previous commercially oriented model of the Indian surrogacy practice and towards one based on altruistic surrogacy. The law also sets some new limitations for intending couples as well as surrogates. National and State Boards plus the respective authorities will regulate the work of surrogacy clinics is one of the significant aspects of the Act.But, by imposing a restrictive surrogacy regime and lack of effective regulation on surrogacy, the Act raises contentious issues for reproductive right and autonomy equality privacy and bodily integrity insurance informed consent, confidentiality and the best interests of the surrogate child. As the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act 2021 is further implemented alongside the ART (Regulation) Act 2021, careful analysis is necessary to evaluate the impact on effective regulation, gender justice and the rights of surrogates and children concerned.
References
1.Agarwal, N. and Sharma, R. (2021) ‘Reproductive autonomy and constitutional morality in India’s surrogacy regulation’, Indian Journal of Constitutional Law, 15(2), pp. 45–62.
2.Arora, S. (2022) ‘Commercial surrogacy, exploitation and the transition to altruistic surrogacy in India’, Journal of Family Law and Practice, 8(1), pp. 21–34.
3.Bhatia, M. and Kaur, P. (2023) ‘Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021: Analysing the new legal regime’, Indian Law Review, 7(3), pp. 233–252.
4.Chatterjee, D. (2024) ‘Privacy, bodily integrity and assisted reproductive technologies after the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act’, National Law School Journal, 12(1), pp. 77–96.
5.Desai, V. and Menon, A. (2021) ‘Ethical dilemmas in altruistic surrogacy: An Indian perspective’, Bioethics and Health Policy Review, 5(4), pp. 101–118.
6.Government of India (2021) The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 (Act No. 47 of 2021). New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.
7.Government of India (2021) The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act, 2021. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.
8.Government of India (2022) The Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
9.Government of India (2022) The Surrogacy (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2022. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
10.Government of India (2023) The Surrogacy (Regulation) Amendment Rules, 2023. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
11.Gupta, R. and Singh, T. (2025) ‘Implementation challenges under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021’, Indian Journal of Public Administration and Law, 11(2), pp. 145–163.
12.Indian Council of Medical Research (2021) Ethical Guidance on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Services. New Delhi: ICMR.
13.Jain, S. (2022) ‘Parentage, identity and citizenship issues in surrogacy arrangements’, Journal of Contemporary Legal Studies, 9(2), pp. 88–105.
14.Khosla, M. and Verma, A. (2024) ‘Article 21 and reproductive decision-making in India’, Constitutional Governance Review, 6(1), pp. 59–80.
15.Kumar, P. (2023) ‘The rights of children born through surrogacy: A human rights analysis’, Child Rights Law Review, 4(3), pp. 112–129.
16.Menon, N. (2021) ‘Gender justice and reproductive labour in commercial surrogacy’, South Asian Journal of Gender Studies, 13(1), pp. 31–49.
17.Mishra, A. and Rao, K. (2022) ‘Clinic regulation and institutional accountability under India’s surrogacy framework’, Health Law and Policy Quarterly, 10(4), pp. 201–219.
18.Nair, L. (2025) ‘Surrogacy, dignity and informed consent: Reassessing legal protections for surrogate mothers’, Indian Journal of Medical Ethics and Law, 3(1), pp. 66–84.
19.Patel, H. and Dutta, P. (2024) ‘Comparative perspectives on altruistic surrogacy: Lessons from the UK, Canada and Australia’, Comparative Family Law Journal, 14(2), pp. 154–173.
20.Raghavan, V. (2022) ‘Reproductive rights and State regulation after the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021’, Journal of Indian Legal Research, 4(2), pp. 1–19.
21.Roy, A. and Banerjee, S. (2023) ‘Medical risks, insurance and postnatal care in Indian surrogacy practice’, Indian Journal of Health Policy, 7(2), pp. 93–111.
22.Sharma, K. (2026) ‘Digital governance and national registries in assisted reproductive technology regulation’, Journal of Technology, Law and Society, 2(1), pp. 25–44.
23.Singh, R. and Chawla, P. (2024) ‘Constitutional scrutiny of eligibility restrictions under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act’, Indian Constitutional Studies, 18(3), pp. 117–138.
24.Sood, V. (2021) ‘Cross-border reproductive arrangements and the future of surrogacy regulation in India’, Asian Journal of International and Comparative Law, 6(4), pp. 210–228.
25.United Nations Human Rights Council (2022) Women’s Autonomy, Equality and Reproductive Decision-Making in Assisted Reproduction. Geneva: United Nations.
26.World Health Organization (2021) Ethical Considerations in Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Geneva: WHO.
27.Yadav, P. and Kulkarni, M. (2025) ‘Psychological counselling and mental health support for surrogate mothers in India’, Journal of Reproductive Health and Society, 5(2), pp. 134–152.
28.Banerjee, R. (2026) ‘Surrogacy law reform and the need for a rights-oriented regulatory model in India’, Indian Journal of Family and Constitutional Law, 9(1), pp. 41–63.
29.International Federation of Fertility Societies (2023) Global Trends in Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Regulation. London: IFFS.
30.UNESCO (2024) Bioethics, Human Dignity and Reproductive Technologies: Contemporary Challenges for National Legal Systems. Paris: UNESCO.
