Artificial Intelligence and Workforce Preparedness in India: A Human-Capital and Sociotechnical Perspective on Labour-Force Adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66635/p359m560Keywords:
artificial intelligence, workforce preparedness, AI literacy, reskilling, human capital, labour market, continuous learning, India, technological transformation, employmentAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly changing the organisation of work, the composition of occupational tasks and the skills required to remain employable. For India, these changes are particularly important because the country combines a large working-age population with substantial differences in education, occupational exposure, digital capability and access to training. Consequently, the employment consequences of AI are likely to depend not only on the extent of technological adoption but also on the preparedness of workers and institutions to adapt. This study examines the preparedness of the Indian labour force to adapt to AI-driven employment changes, corresponding specifically to the fourth objective of a broader empirical investigation of AI and employment in India. Drawing on human capital theory, the technology–organisation–environment perspective and a sociotechnical view of AI-enabled work, the study conceptualises workforce preparedness as a multidimensional capability involving AI-related skills, organisational training, continuous learning, skill-gap management and institutional support. Primary data were collected from 600 respondents working across manufacturing, IT services, HR and finance, healthcare, and sales and marketing. Reliability analysis, principal component analysis, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA were employed. The workforce preparedness scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .775). The overall workforce-preparedness mean was 3.807 on a five-point scale. The factor analysis showed strong sampling adequacy (KMO = .957; Bartlett's test p < .001), while four components jointly explained 53.52% of the variance. Workforce preparedness was strongly associated with AI adoption (r = .817, p < .001) and AI economic impact (r = .810, p < .001). The reported regression model yielded R = .784, R² = .615 and F(1,598) = 954.800, p < .001, with an unstandardised coefficient of .814. Significant differences were also identified across gender, age, job level and years of experience, whereas differences across sectors in workforce preparedness did not reach the conventional 5% significance level. The findings indicate that Indian workers perceive themselves as moderately well prepared for AI-driven changes, but preparedness remains uneven across demographic and career groups. The study contributes to the emerging AI-workforce literature by arguing that readiness should be understood not as a static individual attribute but as a jointly produced capability arising from worker skills, organisational support, institutional learning systems and the wider technological environment. The results suggest that India's AI transition will require continuous learning, workplace reskilling, practical AI literacy, industry–academia collaboration and inclusive policy support.
References
1.Agarwal, A., Sebastian, M. P., & Krishnan, S. (2026). Understanding GenAI teammates in the workplace: A sensemaking and sensegiving analysis of user reviews. Information Systems Frontiers, 28, 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10672-5
2.Baines, J. I., Dalal, R. S., Ponce, L. P., & Tsai, H.-C. (2024). Advice from artificial intelligence: A review and practical implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1390182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390182
3.Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044
4.Demszky, D., Yang, D., Yeager, D., et al. (2023). Using large language models in psychology. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00241-5
5.Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., & Bescond, D. (2023). Generative AI and jobs: A global analysis of potential effects on job quantity and quality (ILO Working Paper 96). International Labour Organization.
6.Hughes, L., Malik, T., Dettmer, S., Al-Busaidi, A. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2025). Reimagining higher education: Navigating the challenges of generative AI adoption. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10582-6
7.Hu, X., Gao, H., Agafari, T., Zhang, M. Q., & Cong, R. (2025). How and when artificial intelligence adoption promotes employee knowledge sharing? The role of paradoxical leadership and technophilia. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1573587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1573587
8.Jia, J., Ning, X., & Liu, W. (2025). The consequences and theoretical explanation of workplace AI on employees: A systematic literature review. Journal of Digital Management, 1, Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44362-025-00016-3
9.Kelley, K., et al. (2025). The AI literacy development canvas: Assessing and building AI literacy in organizations. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2025.10.001
10.Khan, M. I., Parahyanti, E., & Hussain, S. (2024). The role generative AI in human resource management: Enhancing operational efficiency, decision-making, and addressing ethical challenges. Asian Journal of Logistics Management, 3(2), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.14710/ajlm.2024.24671
11.Kim, B.-J., & Lee, J. (2024). The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: The crucial role of self-efficacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1561. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04018-w
12.Liu, Q., Tian, Q., Li, X., & Tan, H. (2026). How does organizational AI adoption affect employees' job crafting behaviors? An approach-avoidance perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1690238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1690238
13.Lin, X., Meng, L., & Chen, L. (2025). Reaffirming oneself: Exploring how artificial intelligence introduction drives employee approach crafting through a self-affirmation lens. Journal of Business Research, 199, 115541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115541
14.Lozie, D. R., Omasa, R., Hesami, S., Zaman, S., Kajbaf, M., & Raza Malik, A. (2024). Examining the impact of generative artificial intelligence on work dynamics. Human Resources Management and Services, 6(2), 3420. https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v6i2.3420
15.Nisa, M., & Kim, B. (2025). Employee adoption and leverage of generative AI in the workplace: A systematic review. The Journal of Information Systems, 34(4), 97–124.
16.Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
17.OECD. (2023). OECD employment outlook 2023: Artificial intelligence and the labour market. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/08785bba-en
18.Passlack, N., Hammerschmidt, T., & Posegga, O. (2026). With great power comes great responsibility: What shapes AI literacy for responsible interactions of knowledge workers with AI? Information Systems Frontiers, 28, 11–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10648-5
19.Pataranutaporn, P., Liu, R., Finn, E., & Maes, P. (2023). Influencing human–AI interaction by priming beliefs about AI can increase perceived trustworthiness, empathy and effectiveness. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5, 1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-023-00720-7
20.Quan, J., Li, Y., Zhang, M., & Wu, Z. (2025). Gain or pain: The double-edged sword effect of artificial intelligence adoption on employee service performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70023
21.Salah, M., Alhalbusi, H., Ismail, M. M., & Abdelfattah, F. (2024). Chatting with ChatGPT: Decoding the mind of chatbot users and unveiling the intricate connections between user perception, trust and stereotype perception on self-esteem and psychological well-being. Current Psychology, 43, 7843–7858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04989-0
22.Sartori, G., & Orrù, G. (2023). Language models and psychological sciences. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1279317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1279317
23.Sousa Pinto, A., Abreu, A., Pérez Cota, M., et al. (2025). A meta-analysis of TOE factors driving organizational adoption of artificial intelligence across industries. Discover Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00747-2
24.Sun, L., Hu, R., & Su, H. (2026). Unlocking human potential in the AI age: How employee–AI collaboration transforms work engagement through dual psychological pathways. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1705671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1705671
25.Woods, L., Lyons, K., Van Der Vegt, A., Olsen, Q., Huang, W., Khor, J. S., & Xu, N. (2026). Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence education and training for healthcare workers: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 26, 549. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08969-3
26.World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum.
27.Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Yan, Q., & Na, M. (2025). Empowering workforces in AI-driven environments: Co-skilling, organizational support, and mitigating job insecurity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1700129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1700129
28.Zhao, R., Niu, L., Chen, Z., & Fan, Y. (2025). How organizational AI adoption and employee AI skills fit to affect organizational performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.12059abstract
29.Yan, X., Zhu, Q., Yu, S., & Huang, X. (2026). AI technology and labor skill transformation: Theoretical and empirical evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 227, 124619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2026.124619
30.Guffler, M., Mentzel, T., & Schmidt, C. V. H. (2024). Teamwork in the age of generative AI: Examining the effect on job satisfaction. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2024(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.13230
31.Hu, X., Gao, H., Agafari, T., Zhang, M. Q., & Cong, R. (2025). How and when artificial intelligence adoption promotes employee knowledge sharing? The role of paradoxical leadership and technophilia. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1573587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1573587
32.Liu, Q., Tian, Q., Li, X., & Tan, H. (2026). How does organizational AI adoption affect employees' job crafting behaviors? An approach-avoidance perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1690238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1690238
33.Sun, L., Hu, R., & Su, H. (2026). Unlocking human potential in the AI age: How employee–AI collaboration transforms work engagement through dual psychological pathways. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1705671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1705671
34.Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Yan, Q., & Na, M. (2025). Empowering workforces in AI-driven environments: Co-skilling, organizational support, and mitigating job insecurity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1700129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1700129





