Understanding workplace psychology of Gen Z: How Office Peacocking and Gamified Systems used to engage the workforce through SDT and KAHN theory

Authors

  • Pooja Singh G L Bajaj Institute of Management and Research Author
  • Ajay Kumar Chouhan Professor, BIM, Trichy Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66635/kd2wmh78

Keywords:

Office peacocking, gamified system, SDT, Kahn theory, employee engagement, organisational commitment

Abstract

The study examines office peacocking and gamified systems as the engagement drivers to understand the Gen Z workplace psychology. Employing SDT and Kahn theory, the study provides a comprehensive understanding on the workplace motivations to enhance organisational commitment. It also employs Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritise the dimensions of office peacocking influencing workplace motivation. The data is collected using online questionnaires from 276 Gen Z employees working in Corporates of North India. PLS SEM was used to test the hypothesis. A significant association was observed among office peacocking, gamified systems and employee engagement. By employing SDT and Kahn theory tenets, this study has provided a significant motivational driver for engaging the modern workforce, which provides them with meaningful work, identity alignment, and association towards the workplace.

References

1.Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., and Sidek, M. M. (2017) ‘Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell and Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion’ In Journal of physics: Conference series, Vol. 890, No. 1, pp. 012163

2.Abolnasser, M. S. A., Abdou, A. H., Hassan, T. H., and Salem, A. E. (2023) ‘Transformational leadership, employee engagement, job satisfaction, and psychological well-being among hotel employees after the height of the COVID-19 pandemic: a serial mediation model’, International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol.20, No.4, pp.3609.

3.Afrahi, B., Blenkinsopp, J., de Arroyabe, J. C. F., and Karim, M. S. (2022) ‘Work disengagement: A review of the literature’, Human Resource Management Review, Vol.32, No.2, pp.100822.

4.Albrecht, S. L., Furlong, S., and Leiter, M. P. (2023) ‘The psychological conditions for employee engagement in organizational change: Test of a change engagement model’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.14, pp.1071924.

5.Al-Dmour, Y., Garaj, V., and Clements-Croome, D. (2021) ‘The flourishing of Biophilic workplaces: ‘Second Home ‘offices as a case study’, Intelligent Buildings International, Vol. 13, No.4, pp.261-274.

6.Alexandersson, A., and Kalonaityte, V. (2018) ‘Playing to dissent: The aesthetics and politics of playful office design’, Organisation Studies, Vol.39, No.2-3), pp.297-317.

7.Asojo, A., and Hazazi, F. (2025) ‘Biophilic Design Strategies and Indoor Environmental Quality: A Case Study’, Sustainability, Vol.17 No.5, pp.1816.

8.Bekk, M., Eppmann, R., Klein, K., and Völckner, F. (2022) ‘All that glitters is not gold: An investigation into the undesired effects of gamification and how to mitigate them through gamification design’ International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.39, No.4, pp.1059-1081.

9.Bhatti, M. (2024) ‘A conceptualisation of a framework for the determinants of team diversity on team performance’, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, Vol.15 No.1, pp. 76-100.

10.Byrne, Z. S. (2022) ‘Understanding employee engagement: Theory, research, and practice’ Routledge.

11.Chans, G. M., and Portuguez Castro, M. (2021) ‘Gamified systems as a strategy to increase motivation and engagement in higher education chemistry students’ Computers, Vol.10 No.10, pp.132.

12.Chopra, A., Sahoo, C. K., and Patel, G. (2024) ‘Exploring the relationship between employer branding and talent retention: the mediation effect of employee engagement’ International Journal of Organisational Analysis, Vol.32 No.4, pp.702-720.

13.Cigdem, H., Ozturk, M., Karabacak, Y., Atik, N., Gürkan, S., and Aldemir, M. H. (2024) ‘Unlocking student engagement and achievement: The impact of leaderboard gamified systems in online formative assessment for engineering education’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol.1-26.

14.Ciuchita, R., Heller, J., Köcher, S., Köcher, S., Leclercq, T., Sidaoui, K., and Stead, S. (2023) ‘It is really not a game: An integrative review of gamified systems for service research’, Journal of Service Research, Vol.26 No.1, pp.3-20.

15.Colenberg, S., Jylhä, T., and Arkesteijn, M. (2021) ‘The relationship between interior office space and employee health and well-being–a literature review’, Building Research and Information, Vol.49 No.3, pp. 352-366.

16.Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., Owusu, E. K., Pärn, E., and Edwards, D. J. (2019) ‘Review of the application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in construction’, International journal of construction management, Vol. 19 No.5, pp.436-452.

17.Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (2012) ‘Self-determination theory’, Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vo.1 No.20, pp.416-436.

18.Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., and Ryan, R. M. (2017) ‘Self-determination theory in work organisations: The state of a science’, Annual review of organisational psychology and organisational behaviour, Vol.4 No.1, pp.19-43

19.De-la-Calle-Durán, M. C., and Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. L. (2021) ‘Employee engagement and wellbeing in times of COVID-19: a proposal of the 5Cs model’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol.18 No.10, pp.5470.

20.ET (2023), “Coffee badging, office peacocking — the new tools being used in return-to-office mandates” https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/jobs/hr-policies-trends/coffee-badging-office-peacocking-the-new-tools-being-used-in-return-to-office-mandates/articleshow/104844432.cms?from=mdr (accessed on 5 June 2024)

21.Etherworld (2024), “ Companies resort to 'Office Peacocking' to retain, lure employees back to office”https://hr.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/workplace-4-0/companies-resort-to-office-peacocking-to-retain-lure-employees-back-to-office-experts/111508985 (accessed on 14 May 2024).

22.Fishbach, A., and Woolley, K. (2022) ‘The structure of intrinsic motivation’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, Vol.9 No.1, pp.339-363.

23.Forbes (2024), “The Rise Of ‘Office Peacocking’ In The Workplace In 2024” https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2024/03/20/the-rise-of-office-peacocking-in-the-workplace-in-2024/ (accessed on 27 June 2024).

24.Gallup report (2024), “State of the Global Workplace” https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx (accessed on 12 June 2024)

25.Gatt, G., and Jiang, L. (2021) ‘Can different types of non-territorial working satisfy employees’ needs for autonomy and belongingness? Insights from self-determination theory’, Environment and Behaviour, Vol.53 No.9, pp.953-986.

26.George, A. S. (2024) ‘India's Employment Crisis: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions’, Partners Universal International Research Journal, Vol.3 No.3, pp.38-60.

27.Grinde, B., and Patil, G. G. (2009) ‘Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being?’, International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol.6 No.9, pp.2332-2343.

28.Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S., and Ray, S. (2021) ‘Evaluation of reflective measurement models’, Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook, Vol.75-90.

29.Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., and Sarsa, H. (2023) ‘Do gamified systems work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamified systems’, Journal of Business Research, Vol.156, pp. 112-125.

30.Hasan, F., and Kashif, M. (2021) ‘Psychological safety, meaningfulness and empowerment as predictors of employee well-being: a mediating role of promotive voice’, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, Vol. 13 No.1, pp. 40-59.

31.Heerwagen, J. H., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K. M., and Loftness, V. (2004) ‘Collaborative knowledge work environments’, Building research and information, Vol.32 No.6, pp.510-528.

32.Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., and Morin, A. J. (2020) ‘Putting the pieces together: Reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT’, Motivation and Emotion, Vol.44 No.6, pp.846-861.

33.Huang, S. Y., Huang, C. H., and Chang, T. W. (2022) ‘A new concept of work engagement theory in cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and physical engagement’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.12, pp.663440.

34.Huda, R. N., Islam, Q. T., and Iqbal, R. (2024) ‘The effect of organisational justice across firm HR practices on employee job satisfaction and firm performance’, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, Vol.15 No.1, pp. 23-43.

35.Huda, S. S. S., and Islam, T. (2024) ‘Strategic use of flowers for creating recreational values in organisations’, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, Vol.15 No.1, pp.61-75.

36.IE (2024), “Office peacocking: Can swanky spaces bring employees, accustomed to working from home, back to office?” https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/workplace/office-peacocking-trends-from-working-from-home-to-back-to-office-9346713/ (accessed on 26 April 2024).

37.Jang, J., Jo, W., and Kim, J. S. (2020) ‘Can employee workplace mindfulness counteract the indirect effects of customer incivility on proactive service performance through work engagement? A moderated mediation model’, Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, Vol.29 No.7, pp.812-829.

38.Judge, T. A., Weiss, H. M., and Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2023) ‘Job satisfaction and employee engagement: A meta-analytic examination of their relationship’, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.108 No.2, pp.234-256.

39.Judge, T. A., Zhang, S. C., and Glerum, D. R. (2020) ‘Job satisfaction’, Essentials of job attitudes and other workplace psychological constructs, Vol.207-241.

40.Kahn, W. A. (1990) ‘Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work’, Academy of management journal, Vol.33 No.4, pp. 692-724.

41.Kahn, W. A., and Heaphy, E. D. (2013) ‘Relational contexts of personal engagement at work’, Employee engagement in theory and practice, pp. 82-96.

42.Kam, A. H., and Umar, I. N. (2018) ‘Fostering authentic learning motivations through gamification: A self-determination theory (SDT) approach’, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, Vol.13, pp.1-9.

43.Karimi, K., and Nickpayam, J. (2017) ‘Gamified Systems from the Viewpoint of Motivational Theory’, Emerging Science Journal, Vol.1 No.1, pp.34-42.

44.Knight, C., and Haslam, S. A. (2023) ‘The relative merits of lean, enriched, and empowered offices: An experimental examination of the impact of workspace design on employee well-being and productivity’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.85, pp.101-112.

45.Koirala, R., and Nepal, A. (2022) ‘A literature review on ergonomics, ergonomics practices, and employee performance’, Management, Vol.4 No.2, pp.273-88.

46.Kwon, K., Jeong, S., Park, J., and Yoon, S. W. (2024) ‘Employee development and employee engagement: a review and integrated model’, Career development international, Vol.29 No.2, pp.169-184.

47.Lallukka, A. (2024) ‘Gen Z and Millennials work-engagement, challenges and possibilities: the motivation explaining low engagement numbers among young employees’, Thesis.

48.Liu, Y., Ma, S., and Chen, Y. (2024) ‘The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course’, Frontiers in psychology, Vol.15, pp.1357936.

49.Loch, F., and Federspiel, E. (2024) ‘Supporting Employee Engagement and Knowledge Transfer via Gamified systems in the Context of Sheltered Workplaces: A Literature Review and Interview Study’, In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 94-111.

50.Luarn, P., Chen, C. C., and Chiu, Y. P. (2023) ‘Enhancing intrinsic learning motivation through gamification: a self-determination theory perspective’, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, Vol.40 No.5, pp.413-424.

51.McAnally, K., and Hagger, M. S. (2024) ‘Self-determination theory and workplace outcomes: A conceptual review and future research directions’, Behavioral sciences, Vol.14 No.6, pp.428.

52.Medina-Garrido, J. A., Biedma-Ferrer, J. M., and Sánchez-Ortiz, J. (2020) ‘I can’t go to work tomorrow! work-family policies, well-being and absenteeism’, Sustainability, Vol.12 No.14, pp.5519.

53.Miah, M. T., and Hasan, M. J. (2022) ‘Impact of Herzberg two-factor theory on teachers’ job satisfaction: An implication for the private Universities of Bangladesh’, International Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol.10 No.1, pp.1-5.

54.Miao, S., Rhee, J., and Jun, I. (2020) ‘How much does extrinsic motivation or intrinsic motivation affect Employee engagement or turnover intention? A comparison study in China’, Sustainability, Vol.12 No.9, pp.3630.

55.MLE (2025), https://labour.gov.in/, accessed on (20 March 2025)

56.Morrison, R. L., and Smollan, R. K. (2020) ‘Open plan office space? If you're going to do it, do it right: A fourteen-month longitudinal case study’, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 82, pp.102933.

57.Nguyen, H. T., and Vu, M. H. (2025) ‘Quiet Quitting: Insights from Generation Z workers in Vietnam’, International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, Vol.13 No.01, pp. 8267-8282.

58.Pandita, D., and Ray, S. (2018) ‘Talent management and employee engagement–a meta-analysis of their impact on talent retention’ Industrial and commercial training, Vol.50 No.4, pp.185-199.

59.Pavlova, M. V., Reznichenko, S. I., and Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2023) ‘A new instrument to measure healthy workplace qualities: the People in the Office Scale’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.14, pp.1241555.

60.Podvezko, V. (2009) ‘Application of the AHP technique’, Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol.2, pp.181-189.

61.Pradhan, R. K., and Hati, L. (2022) ‘The measurement of employee well-being: development and validation of a scale’ Global Business Review, Vol.23 No.2, pp.385-407.

62.Ramadhan, B. T. S., and Irawanto, D. W. (2023) ‘The effect of gamified systems on performance with the mediation of motivation and employee engagement’, The International Journal of Social Sciences World (TIJOSSW), Vol.5 No.2, pp.141-158.

63.Rao, K. N., Marigowda, J., and Venugopal, D. (2024) ‘Workplace spirituality and organisational citizenship behaviour: an impact study’, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, Vol.15 No.1, pp.44-60.

64.Ronald, B., and Jan, S. (2020) ‘Behold My Beautiful Space-Quantitative Insights into the Composite Role of Workplace Aesthetics, Personality Type and the Degree of Desk Personalization for Employee Well-Being’, Advances in Management, Vol.13 No.2, pp.1-16.

65.Ronda, L., and De Gràcia, E. (2022) ‘Does office aesthetics drive job choice? Boosting employee experience and well-being perception through workplace design’, Employee Relations: The International Journal, Vol.44 No.5, pp.1077-1091.

66.Rosado-Solomon, E. H., Thatcher, S. M., and Strizver, S. D. (2025) ‘Navigating Mental Illness at Work Using Disengagement and Engagement Pathways’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 2023.

67.Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2006) ‘Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will?’, Journal of personality, Vol.74 No.6, pp.1557-1586.

68.Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2020) ‘Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions’, Contemporary educational psychology, Vol.61, pp.101860.

69.Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2024) ‘Self-determination theory’, In Encyclopaedia of quality of life and well-being research, pp. 6229-6235.

70.Ryan, R. M., and Reeve, J. (2021) ‘Intrinsic motivation, psychological needs, and competition: A self-determination theory analysis’, The oxford handbook of the psychology of competition, pp.240-264.

71.Saaty T (1980) ‘The analytic hierarchy process’, McGraw-Hill, New York

72.Sakimura, H., Sugawara, T., Watatsu, K., Watanabe, R., Tanaka, K., Wakana, A., Muramoto, N. (2025). Is scenery mandatory for restoration? Attention restoration without visual nature elements. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.16, pp.1556672.

73.Saks, A. M. (2023) ‘The mediating role of employee engagement in the relationship between organizational practices and employee outcomes’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.44 No.3, pp.345-362.

74.Saks, A. M., and Gruman, J. A. (2014) ‘What do we really know about employee engagement?’, Human resource development quarterly, Vol.25 No.2, pp.155-182.

75.Shen, H., and Ren, C. (2023) ‘Reconceptualizing employee disengagement as both attitudinal and behavioral: Narratives from China’, Public Relations Review, Vol.49 No.2, pp.102318.

76.Shibata, S., Tokuhiro, K., Ikeuchi, A., Ito, M., Kaji, H., and Muramatsu, M. (2024) ‘Visual properties and perceived restorativeness in green offices: a photographic evaluation of office environments with various degrees of greening’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.15, pp.1443540.

77.Spector, P. E. (1985) ‘Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey’,American journal of community psychology, Vol.13 No.6, pp.693.

78.Srivastava, C., Murnane, E. L., Billington, S. L., and Samuelson, H. W. (2024) ‘Impact of workplace design on perceived work performance and well-being: Home versus office’, Journal of environmental psychology, Vol.95, pp.102274.

79.Thant, Z. M., and Chang, Y. (2021) ‘Determinants of public employee job satisfaction in Myanmar: Focus on Herzberg’s two factor theory’, Public Organization Review, Vol.21 No.1, pp.157-175.

80.TOI (2024), “Office peacocking: All about this emerging workplace trend” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/work/office-peacocking-all-about-this-emerging-workplace-trend/articleshow/109790703.cms (accessed on 12 May 2024).

81.TOI (2025), “8 signs your coworker is 'productivity peacocking' at work” https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/relationships/work/5-signs-your-coworker-is-productivity-peacocking-at-work/photostory/118377719.cms (accessed on 24 Februray 2025).

82.Tuzcuoğlu, D., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Borgers, A., Arentze, T., and Sungur, A. (2025) ‘Differences in preferences for office attributes in hybrid working: Office versus Flexible Workdays’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.104, pp.102587.

83.Wibaselppa, A., Santosa, T. A., Batjo, S. N., Fauzi, R. U. A., Nugraha, A. R., Sinaga, H. D. E., and Wulandari, A. S. R. (2025) ‘The role of employee engagement in increasing Millennial and Gen Z employee retention’, ‘Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business’, Vol. 4 No.2, pp.51-56.

84.Yadav, D., and Yadav, K. (2025) ‘ESG and sustainable workforce finance: linking workforce practices to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals’, People, Profits, and Policy: Redefining Workforce Economics and Financial Strategy in a Disruptive Era, Vol.93-108.

85.Yusoff, A. S. M., Peng, F. S., Abd Razak, F. Z., and Mustafa, W. A. (2020) ‘Discriminant validity assessment of religious teacher acceptance: The use of HTMT criterion’, In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1529, No. 4, pp. 042045).

86.Zhu, Y., Wang, Q., and Zhao, F. (2023) ‘Wood in office spaces: The impact of different wooden furniture on aesthetic evaluation’, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol.13, pp. 986627

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Understanding workplace psychology of Gen Z: How Office Peacocking and Gamified Systems used to engage the workforce through SDT and KAHN theory. (2026). Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, 22(3s), 580-596. https://doi.org/10.66635/kd2wmh78